Madison, Wisconsin (AP) —The Supreme Court of Wisconsin, split on Thursday, adopted “minimal changes” legislation and parliament. Reorganization of maps submitted by Democratic Governor Tony EversPlans to preserve most of the boundaries of the current district, which gives the Republican majority.
This means that Republicans are likely to maintain a majority, as they have in the last decade. However, the map adopted by the court was not as favorable to the GOP as other Republican-controlled parliaments and other alternatives submitted by the Conservatives.
“Hell yes,” Evers said in a statement in response to the ruling. “The map I submitted to the court today, chosen today, is a significant improvement over the map of Gerrymander that Wisconsin had over the last decade and the map of the Republican Party of more Gerrymander that I rejected last year.”
Conservative-controlled courts had previously stated that they would not make major changes to the boundaries that the Republicans had already set up in 2011 and would limit Evers and liberals’ ability to submit maps that are more favorable to Democrats. ..
The Evers map, based on analysis by the Governor’s Office, elects 44 Democrats and 55 Republicans in Congress, and 13 Democrats and 20 Republicans in the Senate. Currently, Republicans have a majority of 61-38 in Parliament and a 21-12 advantage in the Senate.
According to the Evers office, the Republicans will win five seats and the Democrats will win three seats.
In a statement released Thursday night, Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu said: His map deliberately undermined minority representatives for political gain and violated an open and transparent process befitting the public. “
Judge Brian Hagedorn often voted in favor in court, writing a 4 to 3 majority opinion. He joined three liberal judges in court, but three conservatives opposed.
“We said we would choose a map that would evaluate the map for compliance with state and federal law with minimal changes from current law,” Hagedorn voted in favor of a majority. “In conclusion, we rejected the court’s approach of making important policy decisions and assessing competing policy standards.”
Conservative judge Annette Ziegler, in dissent, chose the Evers map as “exercise of judicial activity not bound by evidence, case law, the Wisconsin Constitution, and the basic principles of equal protection.” Said that.
The maps submitted by Evers most closely comply with the standards set by the Supreme Court and comply with federal voting rights law. The governor’s lawyer alleged in court in January.
State legislature lawyers argued that the governor’s legislative map was unconstitutional because it moved too many people to create more districts with a majority of black and Hispanic voters.
All maps submitted had to adhere strictly to the current boundaries, in accordance with the court’s previous order. The court previously ruled that changes to the current map should be limited to the migration revealed by the once-in-a-decade census.
LawForward, a liberal law firm representing several voting stakeholder groups, said the maps adopted were not really fair given the court’s previous rulings.
“But the governor’s proposal will greatly help improve the representation of people throughout the state, within the narrow limits defined by the court,” the group tweeted. “The court has dismissed other options that would further establish Wisconsin’s Partisan Gerrymander.”
Democratic Attorney General Josh Kaul said the court’s decision meant a “much fairer map” than the last decade’s decision, but the least-changed criterion was “the adoption of a truly fair map.” I hindered it. “
Republican legislative leaders did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Sachin Chheda, director of the fair election project, said the dice were “thrown” when the court decided to adopt a “minimal change” approach.
“The map of the factions adopted today, which deliberately deprives the majority of Wisconsin’s inhabitants, is in this case an unfair and poor result and poses a serious threat to our state’s representative democracy. Bring it, “said Cheda.
There is also Federal proceedings in dispute Brought by democratic and independent groups. They could try to adopt a more favorable map as such.
Constituency change is the process of redrawing state political boundaries based on the latest census showing how the population of neighborhoods, cities, and counties has changed since 2010. Mapmakers can benefit political parties in future elections by cramming opposition voters into several districts. Or spread them thinly across multiple districts — a process known as gerrymandering.
In 2018, Democrats won all races across the state, but Republicans occupied more than 60% of the legislative seats. Republicans have blamed some bad Democratic candidates, who argued that Gerrymandering worshiped GOP’s dominance.
Republicans have a majority of 61-38 in parliament and a majority of 21-12 in the Senate. They also hold five of the eight parliamentary seats.
The Republican Party managed the state parliament and the governor’s office in 2011, with the final constituency change. Evers vetoed the Republican map last year and brought the fight to court. Evers called the map “Gerrymander 2.0”.
Copyright 2022 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.
Wisconsin Supreme Court Adopts Governor’s Constituency Change Map | National
Source link Wisconsin Supreme Court Adopts Governor’s Constituency Change Map | National