Thomas: Rittenhaus Verdict | State

Before the right to keep and bear arms was mentioned in the Second Amendment to the Constitution, the founders wrote why they believed that people needed to be armed as part of the “militia.” They said it was a “necessary for the security of a free nation.” The founders knew that freedom was not a natural state of mankind, but that it had to be protected from government authorities and law-breakers trying to limit or abolish it. That is why the preamble to the Constitution begins. You are “our people” and you are not the government.

Following the acquittal of Kyle Rittenhouse by a jury in Kenosha, Wisconsin, there was a familiar statement that he had killed two men and injured a third. Rittenhaus was vigilant. The verdict of the almost white jury again shows the unequal justice of blacks and whites.

The jury selected by Rittenhouse at random included seven females and five males. All but one were white. The Rittenhouse and what he shot is white.

Although it is difficult to pinpoint the motivation, one of the reasons Rittenhaus decided to go to Kenosha may have been his belief in the need to secure a free state.

Think about the corporate riots, looting, and incinerators he seems to have witnessed on television. Scenes from Portland, Oregon, and other cities may have motivated him. He probably saw the police go down, fearing that the police would be recorded on a cell phone camera and involved in police atrocities with the help of the media.

Judge Schroeder reported what the Chicago Tribune reporter called “long anger” about media coverage of the trial. The judge specifically referred to a CNN report in which two legal analysts questioned his decision. First, in a comment by CNN’s Areva Martin, a civil rights lawyer, Schroeder’s decision to ban the use of the word “victim” was “incomprehensible.” Another target of Schroeder’s anger was Jeffrey Toobin. He said the judge’s ruling would allow the defense to provide evidence suggesting that the man shot by Rittenhaus participated in the riots, looting and arson. “The beginning of this really important case is really unnecessary and unfortunate. That’s it. “

Schroeder also criticized the media’s account of how he was reversed in the murder trial that resulted in life imprisonment. Schroeder admitted that he had been revoked in 2008, but claimed proof when the High Court overturned the lower court’s decision. “I was right,” he said.

Returning to the idea of ​​the militia, it is a subject that has been and continues to be debated among legal scholars. The Second Amendment to the Constitution assumes that individuals are the first line of defense against government tyranny and lawlessness. Police couldn’t be anywhere and they were sometimes nowhere during the recent riots in major cities. A video of a predator who appears to be refusing to prosecute a case involving the theft of goods below a certain price in San Francisco and other cities, and the release of the criminal (some new crimes) (Continuing to commit) suggests that outlaws are increasingly calling. shot. Police officers resigned, retired early, or quit their jobs because of the way they were treated and prematurely determined.

If you face someone trying to plunder, destroy or kill your business, do you consider your armed self to be your best defense, or call 911 in the hope that the police will be in time. Do you? Or are you happy that Kyle Rittenhouse is patrolling your city like a security guard in your neighborhood, doing a job that the police can’t do, or not wanting to do it?

Thomas: Rittenhaus Verdict | State

Source link Thomas: Rittenhaus Verdict | State

Related Articles

Back to top button