Tech

The new bill could be a “game changer” for children’s privacy

With the help of Leah Nailen and John Handel

Editor’s Note: Morning Tech is a free version of POLITICO Pro Technology’s morning newsletter, delivered to subscribers every morning at 6am. The POLITICOPro platform combines the news you need with the tools you can use to address the biggest story of the day. Act on the news with POLITICO Pro..

-‘Game changer’: Democrat Kathy Castor Florida has introduced a child privacy bill that advocates say is more promising than anything they’ve seen.

–Plan change? Google today seeks to convince federal judges that antitrust proceedings over their superiority in the digital advertising market should be moved from Texas to their home state of California.

— Broadband money: The Senate is pursuing infrastructure deals, including $ 65 billion, to help keep Americans online — and the winners and losers of the battle are in focus.

Please wait another day: Thursday. Welcome to MorningTec! I am your guest host, Alexandra Levine.

Do you have any hints? News nugget? ‘Send the day to [email protected]Follow us on Twitter. @Ali_Lev.. Did you get an event on our calendar?Send details to [email protected].. anything else? The following team information.And don’t forget: add @MorningTech When @PoliticoPro On Twitter.

Will this new children’s online privacy bill change the course? — — Castor’s bill, which will be introduced this morning, updates the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA), with supporters the strongest ever to bring the 1998 law to the 2021 web. It states that it is a driving force. And that’s an interesting timing. Just on Wednesday, Castor pressured FTC Chair Lina Khan at a house hearing to prioritize the enforcement of COPPA.

— — Fine print: Castor’s vulnerable child and youth information protection (or “PRIVCY”) law prohibits businesses from delivering targeted advertising to children and teens based on online activities, and the site is young. Requests permission before collecting, using, or selling your data. 18 years and over. It establishes a “protected class” for teens between the ages of 13 and 17 and gives them new rights to the data, which applies not only to sites specifically for children, but to all sites used by young people. Parents may file civil suits against companies that they believe are in violation of the law.

— Take clues from the other side of the pond: The law especially lifts parts of the UK Age-appropriate design codeA set of statutory protection standards that children and teens frequently visit apps, social media sites, and online games must meet. “The United States lags behind other countries by prioritizing and protecting young people online, but Congressman Caster’s privacy law begins to change course,” said Ariel Fox, senior adviser to global policy. Johnson said. Other supporters of this proposal include Fairplay and Center for Digital Democracy.

— So what to do first: privacy for children, or privacy for the country, In the form of comprehensive federal data privacy law? And what is likely to pass? These are two of the big questions that Hill hasn’t answered yet.

Children’s privacy is not a partisan issue. Democrats and Republicans share a desire to take safeguards. (Republican member of House Energy and Commerce Committee announced Wednesday bill package Partially deal with child safety online. Due to its common grounds, independent children’s online privacy legislation may be easier to sell than national legislation. There is still no clear way to avoid long-standing commitment.. However, Castor’s proposal today has no co-sponsors at this time.

Google celebrates the day in court — — Search giants today argue in front of a judicial panel on multi-district proceedings that they should hear antitrust proceedings in California that challenge the Texas-led advertising technology empire. JPML, an ambiguous but important group of seven federal judges, is responsible for coordinating proceedings across various jurisdictions. The proceedings of the Justice Department cannot be driven by the panel, but the proceedings filed by the Attorney General of the State do not give similar respect to much of the state’s regrets. (52 AGs support laws that are exempt from JPML jurisdiction over antitrust proceedings.)

— Google claims to integrate Texas proceedings with other San Francisco proceedings The case is most efficient as it involves similar facts and witnesses. Facebook plans to have the same discussion with the panel (because social networks are defendants in several proceedings) Petition for 2018 agreement with Google to split advertising market). Texas lawyers, as well as lawyers involved in a series of private antitrust proceedings filed by newspaper and website publishers, will oppose the transfer of state antitrust proceedings.

First in MT: Klobuchar, Lee, back, sisilink wrap back on the court — The leaders of the House and Senate Judiciary Antimonopoly Act are sending messages to the courts. Don’t parrot Google’s issue to us.In a letter to the administrative department of the judiciary, lawmakers Concerns about judges in the US District Court Roslynn Mauskopf was raised before About the bill (HR 3460, S 1787) to keep the state AG antitrust proceedings out of JPML.

— — sense. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) And Mike Leigh (R-Utah), and the person in charge. David Siciline (DR.I.) and Kenback (R-Colo.) Was dissatisfied with Mauskopf’s letter stating that he “quoted almost verbatim” from Google’s court submission. “We think it’s unusual, if not inappropriate, for the U.S. Court Secretariat to adopt the arguments of the parties in active proceedings in front of the federal court in a policy letter to Congress. “The lawmaker said.

We are trading! — — Senate We cast 67-32 votes on Wednesday night We will begin to consider a compromise on the newly struck bipartisan infrastructure. This includes $ 65 billion in Internet connectivity support initially sought by White House and Senate Democrats. John has details:

— Main revelation: The $ 14 billion package for affordable broadband was a win for democratic negotiators, but could reduce the amount of federal support consumers can receive to cover their monthly bills. There is also sex. Under the FCC’s temporary emergency broadband benefit program, created in December, low-income consumers can get $ 50 a month in aid, but Senator Susan Collins (Republican) said reporters. He told the negotiators that he settled for $ 30 a month when he created the five proposed proposals. Program year extension. 68-page legislative text obtained by John I checked as much later.

— And negotiators seemed to ease Republican concerns about Internet tariff regulation. The result of a meeting involving Collins and Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (DN.H.). NS White House fact sheet It mentions that it contains pricing transparency provisions that help customers compare prices and languages ​​aimed at curbing digital redlining. “This is a problem that has been around for years, but the pandemic really put the spotlight on it,” Collins said of broadband access.

— Who supports the bill? NS Senate overview We hold plans to pay many of the billions of dollars spent from the FCC’s radio auctions. $ 20 billion from future auctions and $ 67 billion from recent C-band spectrum sales by FCC.

New President, Same Rigad Problem — For those wondering if the Biden administration holds the same concerns about the FCC’s decision to allow satellite company Rigad to dive into 5G wireless, Secretary of Commerce Gina Raimondo has resolved it. Letter released on Wednesday (These objections include the possibility of Ligado scrambling GPS signals, which is a concern for the company).

Listen: Facebook’s top lobbyists deal with false alarms — Nick Clegg, Facebook’s Vice President of Global Affairs, joined the false and disinformation experts today to join “Disinformation and democracy—And among other topics, he is expected to deal with Recent criticisms of Facebook’s approach to false information..

— Sneak Peak: “We … remove millions of content. This is believed to lead to direct real-world harm, but people, even if their opinions are not always completely accurate. I want to give you real freedom to express your opinion, or to the left that you don’t remove enough content, even if it can be offensive to others, and if you remove too much There is a right to say. I don’t believe right and left. In the meantime, we try to do the right thing. ”

— — Elsewhere on Social Media-Poetry … Former U.S. national security official Nick Rasmussen is currently the secretary-general of the Global Internet Forum for Counterterrorism (a counterterrorism technology industry group launched by Facebook, YouTube, etc.) and his organization Increased focus To the far right, domestic extremists are not accepted by everyone. “Nevertheless, it will lead to criticism that you are choosing aspects that are political and primarily political debate, and that you may be depriving someone of your freedom of speech.” He told my colleague Mark Scott. Transatlantic Technology Newsletter, Digital Bridge..

Schellen Bart, President and CEO of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America, will resign in late August to take a leading position in AECOM’s global transportation business.

Food for thought: “Let’s take into account the problem of false alarms in vaccines.” Gilad Edelman writes to WIRED.. “Social media is not the reason why the pandemic was not overcome.”

Chip shortage hits iPhone, electric car: “Apple and Tesla are ready to begin to feel the impact of a significant disruption to the global supply of microprocessors.” WSJ report, “Signs that even some of the largest and most supplied companies can no longer avoid the semiconductor crisis.”

Domino effect: Google and Facebook are the latest leaders in deciding to require workers returning directly to the office to be vaccinated. WSJ report.. (Like Apple, Google has postponed returning to work until October.)

Tips, comments, suggestions? Email them to our team: Bob King ([email protected]), Heidi Vogt ([email protected]), John Handel ([email protected]), Alexandra S. Levine ([email protected]), Rear Nailen ([email protected]), Emily Burnbaum ([email protected]), And Benjamindin ([email protected]). Did you get an event on our calendar?Send details to [email protected]..And don’t forget: add @MorningTech When @PoliticoPro On Twitter.

TTYL.



The new bill could be a “game changer” for children’s privacy

Source link The new bill could be a “game changer” for children’s privacy

Related Articles

Back to top button