Steve Bannon’s contempt conviction welcomed by the 1/6 Commission – thereporteronline

Ashraf Karil

Washington (AP) — Steve Bannon, a longtime ally of former President Donald Trump, on Friday for opposition to a congressional summons from the House of Representatives investigating the January 6 riots at the U.S. Capitol. Convicted.

Banon, 68, was convicted for two reasons after a four-day trial in federal court. Eight men and four women deliberated in less than three hours.

When he was sentenced on October 21, he faced up to two years in federal prison. Each count is subject to a minimum of 30 days in prison.

David Shane, one of Banon’s lawyers, said the verdict would not pass outside the court. “This is Round One,” Shane said. “You will see this proceeding reversed in an appeal.”

Similarly, Banon himself said: You will not lose this war. “

He thanked the jury for his service and said he was disappointed with only one. “It was a brave member of the Show Trial Committee, and the J-6 Commission did not have the courage to come here and testify.”

The prosecutor was equally solid on the other side of the verdict.

“The subpoena to Steve Bannon was not an invitation that could be rejected or ignored,” Washington US lawyer Matthew Graves said in a statement. “Mr. Banon was obliged to appear before the House Select Commission to testify and provide the document. It was intentional that he refused to do so, and the jury now now has him. Found that he had to pay the result. “

The Commission sought Banon’s testimony of his involvement in Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Banon initially claimed that his testimony was protected by Trump’s claim of executive privilege. However, as Trump dismissed Banon from the White House in 2017, the House Panel and the Justice Department claimed that such claims were suspicious, and Banon was a civilian when he was consulting with the then president in preparation for a riot. It was January 6, 2021.

Banon’s lawyer tried to claim that he did not refuse to cooperate during the trial and that the date was “fluid.” They pointed out the fact that Banon offered to reverse the course (after Trump abandoned his objection) and testify in front of the commission shortly before the trial began.

In closing arguments on Friday morning, both sides reemphasized their key position from the trial. The prosecution claimed that Banon deliberately ignored clear and clear deadlines, and the defense argued that Banon believed those deadlines were flexible and negotiable.

Banon was issued a subpoena on September 23, last year, and ordered the requested documents to be submitted to the Commission by October 7, and to appear directly by October 14. After the Justice Ministry was introduced to the House Committee.

Banon lawyer Evan Corcoran told the jury in closing arguments on Friday that these deadlines were merely “placeholders” and that both lawyers were negotiating terms.

Corcoran said the committee “wanted to set an example for Steve Bannon” and “hurried to make a decision.”

Corcoran also hinted that Christine Amarling, the government’s main witness and chief adviser to the January 6th Commission, was personally prejudiced. Amarling admitted at the stand that she was a Democrat of her lifetime and was a friend of one of the prosecutors for many years.

January 6 Democratic Chairman Bennie Thompson was a special target for Banon and his defense team. His name was raised many times during the trial, but Judge Karl Nichols of the US District Court warned the defense not to claim in court that the committee itself was politically biased. Banon severely criticized Thompson by name in his daily statement outside the courthouse. At some point, Thompson’s COVID-19 diagnosis last week means it was forged to avoid the pressure that emerged.

Thompson and Commission Vice-Chair Liz Cheney, R-Wyoming, welcomed the verdict in a statement, calling it “the victory of the rule of law and an important affirmation of the work of the Election Commission.”

“Anyone who interferes with the investigation of these issues should face the consequences, just as everyone responsible for the January 6 case must be accountable,” they said. “No one is beyond the law.”

The prosecution focused on a series of letters exchanged between the Commission on January 6 and a Banon lawyer. Communications indicate that Thompson immediately dismissed Banon’s claim that he was exempted by Trump’s claim of executive privilege and explicitly threatened Banon in criminal charges.

“The defense wants this to be difficult, difficult, and confusing,” said Amanda Bourne, Assistant United States Attorney. “It’s not difficult. It’s not difficult. It’s as simple as it looks, so there were only two witnesses.”

The defense pleaded acquittal on Thursday, saying the prosecution did not prove the fact. “There is no rational jury to conclude that Mr Banon refused to obey,” Banon’s lawyer Corcoran said in his acquittal in front of Judge Nichols.

When the motion was issued, the defense withdrew the proceedings without witnesses, and Banon told Nichols that there was no point in witnessing, as the judge’s previous judgment destroyed his planned defense path. .. In particular, Banon’s team was barred from claiming to believe that Banon was protected by executive privilege, or calling Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi or a member of the House Commission as witnesses.


Associated Press reporters Michael Balsamo and Gary Fields contributed to this report.

Follow the Associated Press report of the January 6 Commission Hearing at

Steve Bannon’s contempt conviction welcomed by the 1/6 Commission – thereporteronline

Source link Steve Bannon’s contempt conviction welcomed by the 1/6 Commission – thereporteronline

Related Articles

Back to top button