Rebecca Vardy is “very sad and disappointed” after losing the defamation case of “Wagasa Christie.”
Former England captain Wayne Rooney’s wife, Coleen Rooney, was told by Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy’s spouse Rebeka in a social media post about her in October 2019. He accused him of leaking the story to the media. Legal action against her fellow WAG as she denied liability for the leak.
36-year-old Coleen publicly claimed to be the source behind three fake articles that Rebekah posted on her private Instagram page-Rebekah was an approved follower-and her social media. The term “WAGS” is an acronym used to refer to the wives and girlfriends of famous sportsmen who were called “Wagatha Christie” for their research.
In a High Court ruling on Friday (29.07.22), Judge Stein determined that it was likely that Vardy’s then agent, Caroline Watt, had “directly acted” to convey the information. did.
Breaking her silence, Rebeka admitted that she was “ravaged” and called for the end of “sneaky abuse” that she and her family claimed to have suffered as a result of Colleen’s post.
She said, “I am very sad and disappointed with the decision made by the judge. It is neither the result I expected nor the result I believed to be correct. I brought this action to prove my reputation. , Was overwhelmed by the judge’s discovery.
“The judge acknowledged that the publication of Colleen’s post was not in the” public interest “and rejected her claim that I was a” secret wag. ” But for her remaining judgment, she made a mistake. This is what i am I can’t accept it. “
She added: “As I explained in the evidence, I, my family, and even my unborn baby were exposed to nasty messages and vulgar abuse following Colleen’s post.
“Can those who abused me and my family be stopped now? The case is over.
“I want to thank everyone who supported me.”
In contrast, Colleen said he was “satisfied” with the results.
In her statement, she said: “Of course, I’m glad that the judge agreed with her decision today.
That wasn’t the case I’ve ever looked for or wanted.
“I couldn’t believe I should have gone to court at such a cost during difficult times for many, even though I was able to spend much better on helping others,” she added. rice field.
She continued. “Both before and after posting on social media in October 2019, I made every effort to avoid the need for such a drawn public proceeding.
“All my attempts to do so were knocked back by Mrs. (Rebecca) Vardy.
“This left me no other choice, and I had no choice but to file a proceeding to protect myself and end my personal information from being repeatedly leaked to the sun.”
She states: “These leaks from my private Instagram account started in 2017.
“They violated my privacy and the privacy of my family and lasted for almost two years.
“I’m not malicious to Mrs. Vardy, but today’s decision reveals that I was right in what I said in my post in October 2019.
“Finally, I would like to thank everyone who has supported me through this difficult and stressful time, including my legal team, my family, friends, and the general public.”
The judge said: Answer items of potential interest to the press, and additional questions posed by the press via Mr. Watt. “
Stein continued. “In my judgment, the conclusions I have reached and Mrs. Looney have been repeatedly alleged regarding the extent to which the petitioner was engaged in disclosing information about Sun that was only accessible as an authorized follower of the Instagram account she knew. It was private and enough to show that a single meaning was practically true. “
Rebecca Vardy loses “very sad and disappointed” defamation case of Wagasa Christie | Celebrity
Source link Rebecca Vardy loses “very sad and disappointed” defamation case of Wagasa Christie | Celebrity