Harrisburg, Pennsylvania (AP) — A proposal to force voters to decide whether to add a clause to the Pennsylvania Constitution that does not guarantee abortion or the rights associated with public funding of abortion passed parliament on Friday. The next spring, which may enter the ballot.
The term was approved by both the House of Representatives and the Senate after two indicted discussions for the right to abortion or between state legislators who promised voters to oppose the right to abortion5. It was one of two proposed Republican amendments.
“Do we want federal people to fund abortion? Why are we so afraid to ask this question before people?” Among many Republicans. So Clint Owlett, a member of Tioga County, said he would focus on leaving the decision to voters.
Democrats said the measure was a step towards achieving the long-standing goal of banning or severely restricting access to abortion by Republicans.
“That’s the way,” said D-Alegenny’s Rep. Emily Kinkead.
This proposal needs to be passed further in both parliaments at the legislative meeting starting in January, and supporters hope to get it before voters in the Spring 2023 referendum of the Primary. increase.
Voting was largely in line with party policy, with 28-22 votes in the Senate and 107-92 votes in the House of Representatives.
The bill requires a voter ID, allows governor candidates to choose their own candidates, empowers lawmakers to revoke regulations without facing the governor’s veto, and amends the constitution to establish election audits. A plan is also included. Legislators voted for them as packages, but voters consider them individually.
The abortion clause received the most attention in two marathon debates on Friday as parliamentarians voted for the state’s annual budget.
“Women should have their body, the end, and the right to the end,” said Senator Lindsey Williams of D-Allegheny. “If you don’t want to have an abortion, don’t do it, but don’t deprive me of my rights or the right of other women in this federation to make that decision on their own.”
Senator Joe Pittman of Indiana recalled his experience when his child was stillborn nine years ago. He and his wife then named him and received a birth certificate and death certificate.
“So for me, it’s my belief that I stand up and become the voice of a voiceless person. I want to protect what I believe is an unborn life because I believe it. I will stand in, “said Pittman.
In a long house debate, Congressman Melissa Shasterman, D-Chester, called the proposal “very cruel to women.”
“This deprives the individual of her freedom, the woman’s right to control her life,” Shusterman said. “My right to control my life, my sister’s right to control her life, and it inserts political and religious leaders into their radical and uninformed beliefs in the doctor’s office. It makes it possible. “
Franklin County Republican Senator Doug Mastriano, who was appointed Governor of the Republican Party in the November election, argued for voter ID requirements by listing other activities that require identification.
“In a constitutional republic, it is very important for people to have confidence and trust in the electoral system and to participate in voting equally,” Mastriano said.
Regarding a question from fellow governor elections, Senator Dave Argall of R-Schuylkill said he would correct the occasional dysfunctional relationship between independent election officials in the primary.
“The governor and vice-governor of this building didn’t even talk to each other, let alone cooperate with each other,” Argar said.
The legislative Republic is increasingly looking at the constitutional amendment process to avoid the veto of Democratic Governor Tom Wolfe. This allows policy changes to proceed with a simple majority and is much more difficult to undo.
Parliamentarians bring state abortion amendment closer to voting in 2023
Source link Parliamentarians bring state abortion amendment closer to voting in 2023