US & World

Judge Refuses Ballot Questions About Minneapolis Police Fate | Nationwide

Minneapolis (AP) —Tuesday’s judge refused an attempt to bail out a draft amendment to the police’s future charter in Minneapolis, a decision a few days earlier, and an absentee ballot to begin. In the city where George Floyd died during police detention Voting for questions is not counted.

Jamie Anderson, Hennepin County District Judge, said the new words “do not guarantee that voters will understand the essential purpose of the proposed amendment.” It is irrational and misleading. The ballot containing the question will be returned from the printer on Wednesday. Anderson’s orders allow election managers to use ballots, but they are prohibited from counting the votes cast on this issue.

However, her decision is unlikely to be the final word. The 11-hour appeal was coming. Minneapolis lawyer Jim Roider said his office “as part of this year’s local elections, a swift appeal process to ensure that all voters have the opportunity to communicate their position on this critical issue. We are focusing on it. “

The Yes4 Minneapolis campaign, which spearheaded the amendment campaign, petitioned the Minnesota Supreme Court in advance to hear a prompt appeal in the event of a loss. The group tweeted their intention to continue fighting. “In the city where George Floyd was murdered, we seek justice and security for everyone, we will not be silent for the money of judges, mayors, charter committees, police federations, or corporate developers. . Trying to stop democracy. #LetThePeopleVote. “

Former councilor Don Samuels’ lawyer, his wife, and businessman who filed a lawsuit to thwart the proposal, said the ruling was “a victory for Minneapolis voters” in the Charter. He said he was entitled to a ballot that clearly explained the amendments. will do. He still has the authority to order the judge or the Supreme Court to delay the start of voting by a week to 10 days so that all sides can come up with mutually acceptable words and print new ballots. He said he was.

NS The roots of the proposal are in “Police Defense” Movement, it Gained momentum after Floyd’s death last summer It caused protests, public unrest, and public calculations of racial justice. This will replace Minneapolis with a new public safety department that has a minimal staff level police station and can “place” police “as needed”, and its function and funding level will be defined later in the Municipal Charter. The requirement is deleted. Mayor and city council. We do not use the term “refund”. Proponents claim that the city still has police.

NS City council updated language Just hours after Anderson ordered the wording in front of the ballot last week because it was “ambiguous, ambiguous, and unimplementable.” The judge held a follow-up hearing Monday.

Anthony said the client had never objected to letting voters decide, but the city council and Jesus 4 in Minneapolis “couldn’t understand the word correctly because everything went back to police financing.” Insisted.

The amendment of the Charter and the future of the city police are one of the most important issues in the local election campaign. Most council members supported the bill, but Major Jacob Frey tried to keep it away from ballots.

Copyright 2021 AP communication. all rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without permission.

Judge Refuses Ballot Questions About Minneapolis Police Fate | Nationwide

Source link Judge Refuses Ballot Questions About Minneapolis Police Fate | Nationwide

Related Articles

Back to top button