Pennsylvania

Environmentalists blame the U.S. Supreme Court for limiting the EPA’s ability to regulate emissions

Pittsburgh (KDKA) — In a ruling condemned by local environmentalists, the US Supreme Court has reduced federal authority to limit greenhouse gas emissions.

The court ruled Thursday that the Obama administration and the US Environmental Protection Agency have exceeded limits on their plans to limit emissions at coal-fired power plants and direct energy production to wind and solar.

The Cheswick power plant has been closed, which is fine for Heather Lewig, who lives just one block away.

“I especially enjoy the factory closing because I don’t have to clean the pouch every day,” Loebig said.

Over the last decade, three other coal-fired power plants in the Pittsburgh region have been closed due to unprofitability due to the economics and operating costs of coal. However, operators are also dissatisfied with over-regulation. Thursday’s ruling was applauded by state senator Camera Bartolotta of the coal nation.

“This policy was not intended for the Environmental Protection Agency, an unelected bureaucracy, to control everything about energy production,” she said. “And it’s too much for the agency to dictate the entire industry and change the composition of all energy production.”

However, environmentalists say it is the High Court that limits the ability of federal agencies such as the EPA to interpret and protect the environment, such as the Clean Air Act.

Matthew Mehalik of the Breathe Project hopes it isn’t.

“What we don’t want to see is an interpretation that limits the government’s ability to protect citizens’ rights to health and quality of life, but to protect our health for our air. I think there is still a very strong basis and our water and our land. “

In a statement, President Joe Biden said the administration and EPA would not be deterred.

“My administration will continue to use legitimate administrative authorities, including EPA’s legally endorsed authorities, to keep our air clean, protect public health, and tackle the climate crisis.”

Mehalik said this decision should not threaten existing environmental protection legislation.

“The Supreme Court did not invalidate the Clean Air Act,” he said. “The Clean Air Act still exists as a parliamentary statute.”

Loebig said it supports giving the EPA room to impose restrictions on keeping the country away from coal-fired power plants.

“I feel they should close them and have cleaner energy,” Loebig said.

The Clean Air Act is not threatened here, but this decision could limit the EPA’s ability to interpret the law. And that would probably mean that other regulations could be challenged in court.

Environmentalists blame the U.S. Supreme Court for limiting the EPA’s ability to regulate emissions

Source link Environmentalists blame the U.S. Supreme Court for limiting the EPA’s ability to regulate emissions

Related Articles

Back to top button