Dismissed Lancaster County Labor Force Board members sue county and board for discrimination and tort | Local Business

A former managing director of the Lancaster County Labor Development Commission, who was dismissed, claimed wage discrimination based on her gender and illegal dismissal rooted in the investigation of racially hostile work environment complaints. I sued the county.

Cathy Rychalsky, who sued her legitimate maiden name Cathy Carl, said her dismissal was also a retaliation for saying about the investigation. Civil lawsuits allege that the shooting not only violates the state’s whistleblower law, but also violates the obligation to “eradicate cases of race-based employment discrimination.”

Rychalsky led the organization from January 2016 to February when he was dismissed. The board did not reveal the reason for her dismissal. It came after refusing her resignation, and a week after she said she was kicked out of her job.

Lancaster’s Labor Commission operates as a non-profit organization with a $ 6 million budget and board members appointed by the County Commissioner. One of 22 federal and state-funded workforce committees in Pennsylvania, it oversees training programs and CareerLink centers that provide services and programs to companies looking for unemployed or workers.

In a proceeding filed in the U.S. District Court in the eastern part of Pennsylvania, Rikarsky told her the Labor Commission to her. It ended with the email on January 25th She sent to civil servants, community members, and LNP. In her notice of dismissal, the board claimed that the January 25 email was her “her subordinate”, “damaging” and disclosed “private” information.

John W. Moser, a retired assistant director of the Berks County Labor Development Commission, remains Lancaster’s interim director during the search for a permanent director.

In the proceedings, Rikarsky alleges that she was forced to resign because of her efforts to investigate and address complaints in a racially hostile work environment. In the proceedings, Richardski detailed a month-long investigation that unveiled a “pattern of discrimination and hostility” from two employees directed at staff of color. This pattern of discrimination was also witnessed by the white staff interviewed, Rikarsky said in a proceeding.

She also stated in the proceedings that board chairman G. David Sload repeatedly called her a “young woman” and that she was paid less than her predecessor’s man and less than her successor. .. Rychalsky was paid $ 113,000. Moser is paid $ 100 per hour for up to 3 days a week. The salary of her predecessor could not be obtained by LNP on Friday. She said that wage differences were not the result of seniority, qualifications, systems that measure income by quantity or quality of production, or differences based on factors other than gender. The proceedings that Moser did required the same skills, efforts, and responsibilities that Ricalsky did when she did her work, the proceedings said.

Lancaster County Solicitor Jacquelyn E. Pfursich said the county did not comment on the proceedings.

Sload responded on behalf of the Labor Commission.

“LCWDB denies all allegations of Mr. Richardsky’s complaint,” he said in an email statement. “The Board is looking forward to proactively defending the case and providing an accurate account of the case in question. With the advice of a lawyer, the Lancaster Labor Development Commission has been in this dispute. We will not provide any further comments regarding the proceedings in. “

In addition to unspecified monetary compensation for damages, Rikalski removes negative comments about her dismissal from her employment record and amends practices surrounding hostile work environment claims. I am asking for a meeting.

Derek J. Demeri, Rychalsky’s lawyer at Zeff LawFirmLLC in New Jersey, said Rychalsky had filed a formal complaint with the US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission. EEOC is prohibited by law from discussing complaints. No complaints to PHRC have been published. According to its website, most complaints will be resolved or closed for other reasons without proceeding to the hearing stage. Certain information about cases that have been settled or terminated for other reasons is generally not publicly available.

Demeri also said he represented an employee of the Labor Forces Commission who filed hostile workplace complaints. The employee has filed formal complaints with the EEOC, PHRC, and the State Department of Labor, Demeri said.

Dismissed Lancaster County Labor Force Board members sue county and board for discrimination and tort | Local Business

Source link Dismissed Lancaster County Labor Force Board members sue county and board for discrimination and tort | Local Business

Related Articles

Back to top button