Philadelphia, July 22, 2021 / PRNewswire /-Plaintiffs’ lawyers were previously at the federal district court level at a dramatic third circuit court hearing in which Governor Wolf defended the use of police rights to deprive Pennsylvanians of their constitutional rights. He insisted if he won the case.
Incident, county Butler, et al v. Thomas W. Wolf, et al.Was submitted last year in the wake of the COVID crisis after a local business owner, devastated by an illegal COVID blockade, challenged Governor Wolf’s over-administration and abuse of police power.
I heard the case before United States of America Western District Court Pennsylvania, With the judge William S. Stickman IV Make a devastating decision to declare Governor Wolf’s actions unconstitutional. “Even in an emergency, government authority is not free,” Stickland wrote in his opinion. “The Constitution cannot accept the concept of’new normal’where people’s basic freedoms can be subordinate to unrestricted emergency mitigation measures,” he wrote.
“We are proud to stand in front of a court today upholding the Constitution and the constitutional rights of all Americans,” he said. Thomas W. King of Dillon McCandless King Coulter & Graham, plaintiff’s chief lawyer.
“This is the most important case related to the blockade of COVID and whether it is constitutional,” he said. Phil Klein, Director of the Thomas More Society’s Amistad project supporting the proceedings. “The exercise of Governor Wolf’s police power has sacrificed thousands of Pennsylvanians for their work, livelihood, dignity, and freedom,” he said.
“Wolf’s actions weaken election security, undermine election integrity, and urgent orders combined with the acceptance of hundreds of millions of dollars in Zuckerberg money to destroy the constitutional powers of the government’s legislature and judiciary. It reflected the actions of other blue state officials who used the “Klein continued.
“Wolves’ unconstitutional behavior was part of a national strategy designed to undermine the 2020 elections, favoring urban rather than rural and democratic voters over Republican voters. “He said.
Nancy Gifford One of the plaintiffs, Double Image Styling Salon, emphasized the importance of the proceedings. “Governor Wolf has gone too far into using police power,” Gifford said. “The proceedings are about protecting the rights of everyday Pennsylvanians and business owners throughout the state,” she said.
Pennsylvania Parliamentarian Darryl MetcalfAlso, the plaintiffs in this case thanked the Amistad Project for supporting the case. “Thanks to the Thomas More Society’s Amistad project for supporting the legal battle to prevent this tyrannical abuse of power from happening again in the United States,” said Metcalf. Told.
reference. Case: 2: 20-cv-00677-WSS
For more information on the Amistad project, please see below. http://theamistadproject.org/
Source Amistad Project
Amistad Project: Pennsylvania Governor Wolf’s Unconstitutional Abuse of Police Rights Challenged in Third Circuit | Around the Web-Pennsylvania
Source link Amistad Project: Pennsylvania Governor Wolf’s Unconstitutional Abuse of Police Rights Challenged in Third Circuit | Around the Web-Pennsylvania